19
ноя
People who are good at logic games, can you provide the step by step procedure of the approach you take to diagram the setup and figure out hidden inferences including what goes on in your mind at each step. When you are reading the scenario, I guess you would be thinking of a possible way you can set the scenario up. While reading the rules, does everyone fix all the rules in mind and juggle those rules in your mind to analyze the linkage between the rules?
Once you put the pencil on paper, what is the sequence you follow to diagram the entire setup without missing any important information? Do you reread each rule again to jot it down on paper? I feel I am approaching logic games in an ineffective manner. It would be very helpful to know how you guys crack them. I'm not an expert, but here's my 0.02 Just keep drilling (aka do a shit ton of logic games). When you first do them, take as long as you need. Think as long as you need to figure out all the little hidden inferences. Lil boosie for my thugz rar.
LSAT Free Help Area. LSAT Explanations. With the October LSAT just around the corner, you should be in the refining stages for each of the three question types. This includes Logic Games, which – as perhaps the most learnable section – is a great place to invest some fine-tuning.
If you're honestly stumped, just brute force (plug and chug) your way through, you will discover some inferences that way. Finally, consult books/7sage/videos that explain how that specific game. After you do a lot of games, you'll notice that they recycle inferences over and over again (they're just dressed up differently). I just re-read your post. It appears that you should purchase a book on logic games and read through it.
Do that first, then do what I said above. You'll notice that they recycle inferences over and over again Agreed. It's hard to explain exactly how to approach games because it's something that comes naturally once you have done enough of them. For me, with the exception of the really weird games that don't show up often, I only utilized two basic set-ups (ordering and grouping) that I was able to do for every game. Sometimes the diagram is a bit different (vertical instead of horizontal, more lines for multiple variable games, etc.), but the basic concept is the same. The rules will help open inferences.
The game itself is what determines the diagram. The key for me was to find which variable the diagram should be built around. An example would be this: From the powerscore logic games bible pg.
' Doctor Yamata works only on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and Saturdays. She performs four different activities--lecturing, operating, treating patients, and conducting research. Each working day she performs exactly one activity in the morning and exactly one activity in the afternoon. During each week her work schedule must satisfy the following restrictions.' There are three different variables in this game. 1) Days of the week, 2) activities performed, and 3) time of day (morning or afternoon).
Popular Posts
People who are good at logic games, can you provide the step by step procedure of the approach you take to diagram the setup and figure out hidden inferences including what goes on in your mind at each step. When you are reading the scenario, I guess you would be thinking of a possible way you can set the scenario up. While reading the rules, does everyone fix all the rules in mind and juggle those rules in your mind to analyze the linkage between the rules?
Once you put the pencil on paper, what is the sequence you follow to diagram the entire setup without missing any important information? Do you reread each rule again to jot it down on paper? I feel I am approaching logic games in an ineffective manner. It would be very helpful to know how you guys crack them. I\'m not an expert, but here\'s my 0.02 Just keep drilling (aka do a shit ton of logic games). When you first do them, take as long as you need. Think as long as you need to figure out all the little hidden inferences. Lil boosie for my thugz rar.
LSAT Free Help Area. LSAT Explanations. With the October LSAT just around the corner, you should be in the refining stages for each of the three question types. This includes Logic Games, which – as perhaps the most learnable section – is a great place to invest some fine-tuning.
If you\'re honestly stumped, just brute force (plug and chug) your way through, you will discover some inferences that way. Finally, consult books/7sage/videos that explain how that specific game. After you do a lot of games, you\'ll notice that they recycle inferences over and over again (they\'re just dressed up differently). I just re-read your post. It appears that you should purchase a book on logic games and read through it.
Do that first, then do what I said above. You\'ll notice that they recycle inferences over and over again Agreed. It\'s hard to explain exactly how to approach games because it\'s something that comes naturally once you have done enough of them. For me, with the exception of the really weird games that don\'t show up often, I only utilized two basic set-ups (ordering and grouping) that I was able to do for every game. Sometimes the diagram is a bit different (vertical instead of horizontal, more lines for multiple variable games, etc.), but the basic concept is the same. The rules will help open inferences.
The game itself is what determines the diagram. The key for me was to find which variable the diagram should be built around. An example would be this: From the powerscore logic games bible pg.
\' Doctor Yamata works only on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and Saturdays. She performs four different activities--lecturing, operating, treating patients, and conducting research. Each working day she performs exactly one activity in the morning and exactly one activity in the afternoon. During each week her work schedule must satisfy the following restrictions.\' There are three different variables in this game. 1) Days of the week, 2) activities performed, and 3) time of day (morning or afternoon).
...'>October 2003 Lsat Logic Games(19.11.2018)People who are good at logic games, can you provide the step by step procedure of the approach you take to diagram the setup and figure out hidden inferences including what goes on in your mind at each step. When you are reading the scenario, I guess you would be thinking of a possible way you can set the scenario up. While reading the rules, does everyone fix all the rules in mind and juggle those rules in your mind to analyze the linkage between the rules?
Once you put the pencil on paper, what is the sequence you follow to diagram the entire setup without missing any important information? Do you reread each rule again to jot it down on paper? I feel I am approaching logic games in an ineffective manner. It would be very helpful to know how you guys crack them. I\'m not an expert, but here\'s my 0.02 Just keep drilling (aka do a shit ton of logic games). When you first do them, take as long as you need. Think as long as you need to figure out all the little hidden inferences. Lil boosie for my thugz rar.
LSAT Free Help Area. LSAT Explanations. With the October LSAT just around the corner, you should be in the refining stages for each of the three question types. This includes Logic Games, which – as perhaps the most learnable section – is a great place to invest some fine-tuning.
If you\'re honestly stumped, just brute force (plug and chug) your way through, you will discover some inferences that way. Finally, consult books/7sage/videos that explain how that specific game. After you do a lot of games, you\'ll notice that they recycle inferences over and over again (they\'re just dressed up differently). I just re-read your post. It appears that you should purchase a book on logic games and read through it.
Do that first, then do what I said above. You\'ll notice that they recycle inferences over and over again Agreed. It\'s hard to explain exactly how to approach games because it\'s something that comes naturally once you have done enough of them. For me, with the exception of the really weird games that don\'t show up often, I only utilized two basic set-ups (ordering and grouping) that I was able to do for every game. Sometimes the diagram is a bit different (vertical instead of horizontal, more lines for multiple variable games, etc.), but the basic concept is the same. The rules will help open inferences.
The game itself is what determines the diagram. The key for me was to find which variable the diagram should be built around. An example would be this: From the powerscore logic games bible pg.
\' Doctor Yamata works only on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and Saturdays. She performs four different activities--lecturing, operating, treating patients, and conducting research. Each working day she performs exactly one activity in the morning and exactly one activity in the afternoon. During each week her work schedule must satisfy the following restrictions.\' There are three different variables in this game. 1) Days of the week, 2) activities performed, and 3) time of day (morning or afternoon).
...'>October 2003 Lsat Logic Games(19.11.2018)
Most Popular Pages
© 2019 October 2003 Lsat Logic Games.